Welcome to 96MB, please Login or Create an account to get full access to the forums.
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

RamNode expands to Seattle, Washington.... Early test...

Offline pubcrawler Posted 04-23-2013, 04:10 PM -
Post: #1
Member
97 Posts
Reputation: 5
Beloved low cost VPS provider and 2nd place in the LET recent survey, RamNode has launched a new service way out west and up north in Seattle, Washington.

Supply became available in the past 24 hours and is going fast.

Been real impressed with RamNode in Atlanta, and in the market for something annual and out west, so here we go.

New location features the same bandwidth mix as in Atlanta, Tinet+nLayer.

Opted for the annual, 128MB OpenVZ Cached, as monthly bills are a jungle mess and sick of them. Heck 128MB is what I am trying to limit things to where I can anyways. No 2GB of oversold fake RAM here.

Code:
# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash

CPU model :  Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @ 2.30GHz
Number of cores : 1
CPU frequency :  2299.917 MHz
Total amount of ram : 128 MB
Total amount of swap : 128 MB
System uptime :   7 min,      
Download speed from CacheFly: 33.6MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 25.5MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 38.5MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 3.75MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, NL: 3.12MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 524KB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.42MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 23.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 46.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 12.4MB/s
I/O speed :  667 MB/s

These tests for bandwidth, I am often umm, well, suspect of. Vary depending greatly on number of factors and not always indicative of quality of a facility. Pretty good numbers in most places.

Looks promising. Disk speed is super.

Routing is bound to need tweaked by RamNode, expected I am sure.

Looking forward to seeing RamNode grow and ideally mix their bandwidth up with a third provider.
(This post was last modified: 04-28-2013, 08:26 AM by leyton.)
Back to top Find Quote
Offline zhuanyi Posted 04-24-2013, 12:32 AM -
Post: #2
Senior Member
357 Posts
Reputation: 5
(04-23-2013, 04:10 PM)pubcrawler Wrote: Opted for the annual, 128MB OpenVZ Cached,

You mean SSD-cached?
Back to top Find Quote
Offline coreymanshack Posted 05-07-2013, 09:12 AM -
Post: #3
Member
79 Posts
Reputation: 0
pubcrawler Wrote:No 2GB of oversold fake RAM here.

You probably already know, but not everyone uses all their ram.... and at the end of the day... linux disk cache ends up using about 16GB of ram on our nodes when the node is full. I don't think ram is a limiting factor on boxes really anymore... it's the disks.
Back to top Find Quote


Forum Jump:

User(s) browsing this thread
1 Guest(s)

© 2012 96MB

Community software by MyBB

Premium Theme by ThemeFreak